LibertyNetLibertyNet para desarrolladores
Aún sin traducirEsta página todavía no se ha traducido al Español, así que estás leyendo el original en inglés. No falta porque no importe: simplemente no se ha escrito. Las contribuciones son bienvenidas. Ayuda a traducir esta página

Community

Where to ask, what gets answered, and how to show what you built.

Getting help

Ask in #developers on Discord. Bring:

  • What you were calling, and with which SDK and language.
  • The error's code — every LibertyNet error has a stable one.
  • What you expected instead.
Consejo

Check the error dictionary first. Every code there has a documented cause and fix, and about half of all questions are answered by the entry for the code already in the error message.

Early developers get hands-on help

The network is small enough that this is a real offer, not a slogan: if you are among the first building on LibertyNet and get stuck, say so in #developers and someone will work through it with you directly.

That will not scale forever. Take advantage of it while it lasts.

Showcase

Built something? Post it in #showcase. What is useful to include:

  • What it does, in one sentence.
  • Which parts of LibertyNet it uses.
  • What was harder than it should have been.
Nota

That last one is the most valuable thing you can give us. Friction you hit is friction everyone hits — and it usually means a documentation page is unclear rather than that you did something wrong.

Contributor rewards Planificado

Advertencia

Not implemented, and deliberately not specified.

The intention is that people who write tutorials, build examples and answer questions should be recognised in Credits. But:

  • Credits are a test unit — not cash, not redeemable, not a claim on future value.
  • Nothing is counting them yet. The credits endpoint is live and returns zeros with "source": "not_yet_wired". Details.

  • No rates, amounts or eligibility rules have been decided. None are published here because none exist, and inventing a number to make this page feel complete would be exactly the kind of thing this documentation refuses to do.

The interface is reserved. The economics are not settled. When they are, they will appear here with a badge and a date — not as an implication.

Contribute because the work is useful and you want it to exist. If rewards arrive later, good. Do not budget for them.

Reporting a problem

A documentation page is wrong

Tell us in Discord or open an issue. The fix is the page, not the wording — if a page describes a capability as more finished than it is, we change the badge or the code, never the phrasing.

An endpoint behaves differently from the docs

That is a bug in one of the two. Bring the exact request and response. The capability matrix is the source of truth for what should be true.

A node record failed id-binding

Report this immediately. On the production registry it should always be zero. A record whose DID does not derive from its key is corruption or forgery, and it is worth interrupting someone over.

bash node examples/verify-network/verify.mjs

A security issue

Do not post it publicly. Contact the maintainers directly through Discord and ask for a private channel.

The AI assistant said something false

Report both the question and the answer. A wrong AI answer usually means a page is ambiguous — fixing the page fixes every future answer at once.

What we will not do

Worth stating so nobody wastes their time:

  • We will not describe unbuilt things as built. Not in a launch post, not in a conference talk, not to make a roadmap look better.

  • We will not add a wallet, transfer or trading endpoint quietly. If value movement ever ships, it arrives with its own documentation and its own review.

  • We will not remove a status badge to make a page read better.

If you catch us doing any of these, that is the report we most want to receive.

Contributing

How to add an example, fix a page, or improve an SDK.