LibertyNetLibertyNet für Entwickler
Noch nicht übersetztDiese Seite wurde noch nicht ins Deutsch übersetzt, deshalb liest du das englische Original. Sie fehlt nicht, weil sie unwichtig wäre — sie wurde nur noch nicht geschrieben. Beiträge sind willkommen. Bei der Übersetzung helfen

Contributing

How to add an example, fix a page, or improve an SDK — and the one rule that is not negotiable.

Everything in this portal lives in LibertyNetHQ/LibertyNet-hq under dev-portal/.

The one rule

Warnung

Never describe something as more finished than it is.

Not in a page, not in a code comment, not in an example, not in a commit message. If a capability is not built, say so. If an endpoint returns placeholder zeros, say so next to the zeros.

Every other rule here is a preference. This one is the point of the project.

Layout

dev-portal/
├── api-spec/
│   ├── status.json            # THE capability matrix — every badge derives from this
│   └── libertynet-v1.yaml     # OpenAPI 3.1
├── docs-site/                 # Mintlify: MDX, docs.json, Living Language skin
├── sdk/typescript/            # libertynet-sdk
├── sdk/python/                # libertynet
├── create-libertynet-agent/   # CLI scaffolder
├── mcp-server/                # MCP server for AI assistants
├── dashboard/                 # Developer dashboard (Next.js)
├── examples/                  # Runnable examples
└── tools/                     # Drift and honesty checkers

Run everything

bash
cd dev-portal && node tools/check-all.mjs

This runs every suite plus the honesty checks. It must pass before a PR merges.

Individually

bash cd sdk/typescript && npm test && npm run typecheck cd sdk/python && python3 -m pytest -q cd create-libertynet-agent && npm test cd mcp-server && npm test cd dashboard && npm run build

Against the live network

bash cd sdk/typescript && npm run test:live cd sdk/python && LN_LIVE=1 python3 -m pytest -q

These assert that every identity on the production registry still verifies. If one fails, either the network or this documentation is wrong.

Changing a capability's status

  1. Ship the behaviour first

    A badge changes in the same commit as the behaviour, never before it.

  2. Edit api-spec/status.json

    The single source. Do not hand-edit a badge in an .mdx file — it will be caught.

  3. Run the drift checker

    bash node tools/check-docs-drift.mjs It fails if any page, SDK or spec disagrees with the matrix.

Adding an example

The bar: it must run, it must be honest, and it must teach one thing well.

bash
mkdir examples/my-example
# write it
node examples/my-example/example.mjs        # must actually work
node tools/check-examples.mjs               # must pass

Checked automatically:

  • No hard-coded secrets.
  • Nothing that moves value — LibertyNet has none, so no example can demonstrate one.
  • Identity verification present, with no escape hatch.
  • Unbuilt capabilities throw rather than returning mock data.

And by review: every → output comment must have been produced by running the code.

Writing documentation

Concepts and reference are separate, deliberately

/concepts/ teaches a model. /reference/ is a dictionary you look things up in. Mixing them produces pages that are too long to skim and too shallow to learn from.

Show the real output

Run the code, paste what it printed. Invented output is the most common way documentation becomes false, because nothing ever re-checks it.

Warn where people actually get hurt

The two that cost the most time on this network: status: "active" not meaning online, and DID string comparison splitting one node into two. Both get a <Warning> wherever they are relevant.

Both languages, or neither

TypeScript and Python examples in a <CodeGroup>. A page that shows only one silently tells half the readers this is not for them.

Preview it

bash cd docs-site && npx mint dev

Lanes

This repository classifies changes by risk. For dev-portal/:

ChangeLane
Docs, examples, SDKs, CLI, dashboard, MCP serverGreen — normal review
api-spec/status.jsonGreen, but reviewed carefully — it drives every claim
Anything under frozen/, .github/, or runtime trust-root pathsRed — needs David's approval

Nothing in dev-portal/ touches money, security-critical protocol code, or frozen specifications. If a change to this directory ever needs to, that is a signal the change is in the wrong place.

Pull requests

  • One concern per PR.
  • All tests green, including the honesty checks.
  • If you changed a capability's real behaviour, status.json changes in the same PR.

  • Say plainly what you did not do — an incomplete change with an honest note is far more useful than one that appears finished.

Ask first if unsure

#developers on Discord. Cheaper than writing the wrong thing well.